First Person: The Writing of
Feeling Green
I feel so ambivalent about publishing pieces like this, which are essentially negative critiques of the work in question. This had originally been planned to be a shorter part of an altogether shorter roundup article about current books in Christian environmentalism. (In the subsequent issue of Books & Culture I finish the job, on a much happier note.) But while many books are bad in an uninteresting way, the more I thought and wrote about Roger Gottlieb’s book the more I felt it was bad in an important way. It is bad because it exemplifies so neatly the worst kind of fuzzy thinking that can accompany a certain kind of religious liberalism.
I hate to spend my time, or anyone else’s, piling on to the gaps of logic and (in one case noted in this piece) outright falsehoods in a book that some author worked earnestly on for months or years. I certainly hope that when my book comes out, people who find it simply misguided will just leave it alone. But in this case I felt there was an opportunity to alert readers to some broader issues that need to be wrestled with when we try to make sweeping statements about “religion.” And while I surely bear Dr. Gottlieb no ill will, if my savaging of his book (pardon the civilizationist verb) steers a few people, whatever their religious or environmental convictions, toward more careful accounts of both conservative Christianity and serious environmentalism, I hope that this exercise in criticism will not be offered in vain.
[-]